Tuesday, 29 January 2013

Godparents



THE ROLE OF GODPARENTS IN FAITH FORMATION: CATHOLIC PERSPECTIVE.
Introduction
Charity, they say, begins at home and “faith grows when it is lived as an experience of love received and when it is communicated as an experience of grace and joy”(Porta Fidei.no.7). In this regard, the Catholic Church proposes that godparents or sponsors be given to new converts to accompany them affectionately on the journey of faith so as to help them grow in the faith in their daily life. Sadly, some pastoral problems and crises of faith that the Church experiences in our day can be mapped out to the fact that this provision of the Church has either failed or lost its binding force among the faithful. Or it has been underrated somewhere along the line.
Though space will not allow me to speak to the matter into detail, I deem it fit to write this piece to rejuvenate the pristine strength of mind with which early Christians approached this agency of godparent in the faithful of today and lead them rediscover the importance the Church accords it.
Who is a godparent?
According to Jovian P. Lang, in Dictionary of the Liturgy, godparent and sponsor are ordinarily used interchangeably to refer to those who present the candidate, both for baptism and confirmation, with the intention to make sure that the person will be faithful to the meaning of the sacrament.  However, some people distinguish between them. In this case, while the godparents are chosen to guide the elect during their Initiation Rite, sponsors are chosen to accompany candidates who seek admission to the catechumenate and remain with them to supervise their progress during this process until the Rite of Election, when they may also be chosen as godparents (Jovian P. Lang, Dictionary of the Liturgy1989).
Chambers English Dictionary defines “Godparent” as “a person who, at a baptism, guarantees a child’s religious education or who (loosely) undertakes to bring up the child in the event of the death its parents”. This sounds the bell that the role of a godparent doesn't end with the ceremony. Rather, he or she becomes, in duty bound, the supportive pillar for the child and must show keenness and interest in the upbringing of the child. Customarily, the godparent is someone outside the immediate family who follows the same faith.

Godparenting in the New Testament and Its Implication for Christians.
God-parenting is an age-old tradition that can be traced back to the age of the apostles. This is very loud in the letters of St. Paul. Paul led many people to Christ and helped them mature spiritually. In this regard, Steve Jonathan sees a godparent as essentially “a spiritual guide” to the child or the baptized or the confirmandi. As a spiritual father, with a deep concern for his spiritual children, Paul wrote he felt he was ‘going through labour pains for Galatians and this he said would continue until Christ has been fully developed in their lives.’ (cf. Gal.4:19). To the Ephesians wrote: “This will continue until we all come to such unity in our faith and knowledge of God’s Son that we will be mature in the Lord, measuring up to the full and complete standard of Christ.” (Eph.4:13). Here we see the goal of god-parenting plainly stated.
Christ has given his church an enormous responsibility ‘to make disciples in every nation’ (cf.Mat.28:18-20). This entails preaching, teaching, healing, nurturing, giving, administering, building, and many other tasks. It will be impossible for individuals to fulfill this mandate alone. Luckily, Christ calls us (the Church) together as members of his body.  As members of the body of Christ we can achieve more together than we would dream possible working by ourselves individually. Working together, the church can express the fullness of Christ. This “fullness” is expressed only in Christ (Col. 2:9, 10) yet in union with Him, who is the head over every ruler and authority (Col.2: 9; Jn1:14, 16), and through his empowering spirit, we are made whole. Consequently, every Christian and in a special way “Godparents” are able to tell others about Christ, warning everyone and teaching everyone with all the wisdom God has given them so as to present humanity to God, perfect in their relationship to Christ (cf.Col.1:28); that is, to present each believer, though not “flawless”, spiritually mature.

History and Place of Godparenting in the Catholic Church
The role of the godparent for baptism is rooted in the role of the sponsor in the catechumenate, which originated in the early Church. This was a safety measure the Church adopted to get around pagan infiltration and persecution. This was necessitated by the fact that until the year 313, the Church was under the persecution of the Roman Empire and had to be precautious in carrying out its relationships. Besides, until the Middle Ages, the Sacraments of Initiation — baptism, holy Eucharist, and confirmation — were administered at once and a sponsor was needed to attest to the integrity of the person, often times an adult, seeking admission into the Church. The sponsor assists him/her during the catechumenate in preparing for these sacraments and in living a Christian life. For infants, these sponsors would also make the Profession of Faith in the child's name and accept the responsibility of instructing the child in the faith, especially if the parents failed in this duty. However, there is no legal commitment here and the godparent is not the legal guardian of the child. This is in keeping with the Code of Canon Law, which recommends that the one to be baptized should be offered a sponsor to assist him or her in the Christian initiation, in the case of an adult, and together with the parents, to present an infant at baptism. This sponsor will help the baptized to lead a Christian life in harmony with baptism, and to fulfill faithfully the obligations connected with it (cf. no. 872).

Recommendations and Conclusion
As we have seen, ‘Godparenting’ is a great responsibility and godparents serve a special role in the life of the baptized person. As a result, the godparent must ensure that the child is well versed in the fundamentals and practices of his religion and must be keen in the other aspects of the child's life as well. Those will include birthdays, holidays, graduation and any other special event in the life of the child. Godparent and the child might live in different houses or might have great physical distances between them, but the godparent should ensure that he allocates some time for the godchild and visits him often.
Therefore, each parent should choose a godparent not just because of a blood relationship or friendship; rather, a person who is a trustworthy witness of the faith who will help the godchild attain salvation. Technically, only Catholics can be godparents or sponsors. A Christian of another denomination, whether Orthodox or Protestant, however, may be a "Christian witness" to the baptism along with the Catholic godparent since the godparent takes responsibility for the religious education and spiritual formation of the baptized person and at the same time represents the Church, the community of faith, into which the person is baptized (Cf. Vatican II, Decree on Ecumenism, No. 57; canon, No.874). That is why it is expedient that Godparents should be faithful individuals who are ready to accept the responsibility of being a part of a godchild's life for the rest of his life.
I humbly wish to submit that pastors of souls and their associates as well as their collaborators pay special attention to the role of godparents in the faith formation of new converts and put necessary measures in place to prepare the godparents for the task. This I pounce will lend a hand to the godparents to be able to instill the faith of Mother Church in ‘the today’ of the converts.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Saunders, Rev. William. "The Role of Godparents" Arlington Catholic Herald.
Benedict XVI, Apostolic Letter Porta Fidei  For The Induction Of The Year Of Faith, Given In Rome, At Saint Peter’s, On 11 October In The Year 2011.
Wroblewski, Fr. Sergius, Summary on Porta Fidei paragraphs as numbered in original document online.
Lang, Rev. Jovian P., Dictionary of the Liturgy, Catholic Book Publishing Co., New York, 1989.
Flannery, Austin, Vatican II: The Conciliar and Post Conciliar Documents, St. Pauls, Bandra, Mumbai, 2001.
Life Application Study Bible New Living Translations (2nd Edit.), Tyndale House Publishers, Inc. Carol Stream, Illinois, 2007.                                                                                                                                       

Monday, 5 December 2011

THOUGHTS TOGETHER


OPENNESS TO GOD
According to Thomas H. Green, “Falling in Love with Love is falling for make-believe”. The true object of our love exists only in our imagination. Opening to God as human friend throws a real challenge of honest self-knowledge. Though we cannot see and hear and touch as we can human lover, it worth mentioning that tangibility does not necessarily (married couples). The problem in prayer or in our relation to God is not the visibility of God. Rather, the cost of real self- knowledge is than most of us are willing to pay. We (love to) cling to our illusions, and our ignorance about our real self. Good self-knowledge leads to the experience divine love. While we are always “getting to know ourselves and each other as long as we live, our relationship moves from the head (knowledge) to the heart (experiencing, loving). At this time we seek the joy of being with the one we love rather than insight. We become drawn simply to be present to the Lord in Love to sit before him, to bask in his love.
 Strange as it may sound to a couple on their wedding day, we need the “worse” as much as the “better” in order to make love real (the example of Hosea& job). In the better we learn the joy of loving; in the worse we to love unselfishly. When things are difficult, when friction and personality clashes arise then we learn to love the other for his/her own sake. Not because I feel good about it but because the other’s happiness and well-being are important to me.
Come out of Come out of or comfortable zones. Do not settle for a level of comfortable mediocrity, loving but not too much; giving but only within the comfortable limits you have set for yourselves. Open up yourselves to God; learn to let go and let God. Risk your total honesty with God, for I need, you need, we need to let Him reveal the truth about our relationship with Him even if it is painful, embarrassing, or disgusting. Remember Jesus proclaimed that the truth will set us free if we know it and accept it (cf. John 12:42-43). Do not be like the Pharisees seeking the truth and desiring the freedom of eternal life, and yet cannot risk standing naked before the Lord.
ACCEPTING MY SINFULNESS
All have sinned and fallen short of God’s grace. Man thus constantly stands in need of grace. Our sin has grown into a weaken sense of Truth in us.  We cannot differentiate truth from falsehood, right from wrong, good from bad or evil. Many of us cannot show any remorse for a crime, for a wrong done, or for displeasure caused a friend, simply because they are “normal” for us. But how normal is that normal thing when it hurts?
The realization of our nothingness and sinfulness must not overwhelm us. The realization should rather bring great consolation to us if we really fear the lost of God whom we love. Becoming furious, fixated upon such realization would not do us any good. If we are to grow in love we have to accept the reality of our sinful condition and even come peace about it. Not because we like it but because the Lord accepts and loves us as we are and wishes to purify and transform us. We do not make ourselves worthy of his love by bewailing our; rather he makes us worthy by loving us (Rom 5:8, 10). We are therefore called to daily humble acceptance of our sinfulness and nothingness; and while desiring to grow, we must come to peaceful terms with the reality of who God is and who we are. What we need is “a method of empting and purifying our spiritual faculties of all that are not God. Someone who has fallen in love thinks nothing of living family and friends to be with the beloved. Let us ask God to stretch our hearts, minds, and memories so that they can contain His infinity in order to cooperate freely with His loving initiative.
                                        

EXAMINE ANY FOUR WAYS ZORASTRANISM COULD HAVE INFLUENCED CHRISTIANITY


Zoroastrianism is both a religion and a philosophy. The term Zoroastrianism is, in general usage, essentially synonymous with Mazdaism, the worship of Ahura Mazda, exalted by Zoroaster as the supreme divine authority.[1] Zoroastrianism is one of the oldest world religions which is believed to be the most probable foundation to the entire world-known religions that shares many features that seem to connect them together.It is a Persian religion centred “on the life and teachings of Zoroaster, or as he should more properly be called, Zarathustra.”[2] It is believed that Zoroastrianism flourished as a state religion of the three mighty Iranian empires of the Achaemenians (549-330 B.C.E), the Parthians (248 B.C.E-224 C.E), and Sasanians (224-652C.E). The Jews were subjects to the Achaemenians, and are believed to have adopted some of the main teachings of Zoroastrianism and transmitted them in due course to Christianity and latter to Islam[3].
This religion has undergone stages of development and periods, such as Sassanian Zoroastranism, and the Zurvanism.[4] But, it is difficult to accurately describe the age of this religion because there is some debate over when the prophet for who it is named, Zarathustra  actually lived. What is known, however, is that for a period of approximately 1,000 years, Zoroastrianism was a very prominent religion, certainly the most powerful in the Middle East, perhaps the most powerful in the world. Over this period, this is generally held to have been from 549 B.C.E. to 642 C.E.. Yet some Scholars believe that Zoroaster lived sometime between 1750 and 1500BC. As I have mentioned earlier on, it is widely known that Zoroastrianism communicated some of its traditional ideas to some of the adherents of Judaism which were incorporated to some degree into the Jewish faith. However, because both Christianity and Islam were founded after Zoroastrianism, they were both believed to have been influenced to a much greater degree by zoroastrianism, and tenets of faith that were originally found in Zoroastrianism were incorporated into Christianity and Islam on a very noticeable level[5].
Nonetheless, this paper will concern itself with the probable influences that Zoroastranism might have had on the Christian Religion in four basic areas. To a great extent, it is likely that Zoroastrianism influenced Christianity in many spheres, especially, Christian ontology.The most notable of these aspects are the notions of God’ dualism, judgement at death, heaven and hell, a savior born of a virgin, a final judgement, and resurrection. All of these concepts were originally taught in Zoroastrianism before Christianity. Therefore, since Zoroastrianism preceded Christianity it is highly probable that it influenced Christianity. Based on the ongoing argument, one can say that Zoroastrianism has influenced the Christianity concept of monotheism. Zoroastrianism teaches that polytheism is not good and that there are two opposing forces in the universe, namely, forces of evil and forces of goodness.”[6] According to Zarathustra, forces of goodness alone is worthy of worship. “He referred to this ‘one Spirit’ as Ahura Mazda (the Wise Lord), the only supreme being to be worshipped”.[7] And the “forces of evil he calls Ahrima or Angra Mainyu.”[8] In Christianity, ‘God the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ’ is the only God. He is One in nature but three in Persons: God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit. “We do not profess three Gods, but one God in three persons, the consubstantial Trinity...God is One but not solitary.”[9] This teaching of the Christian church is evident in the Scripture (Cf. Matthew 28:19).
Scholars have shown that there are many aspects of Christianity that were not drawn from Judaism, although that religion was the major predecessor of Christianity. As I have hinted on earlier one of the most obvious tenets of Christianity that has its roots in Zoroastrianism is the concept of dualism. The Zoroastrian faith believes in two original spirits; Ahura Mazda, the Eternal and Uncreated, the Wise Lord, and Angra Mainyu, Uncreated but not Eternal, the Evil Spirit. From this basic concept springs many others, many of which are also found in Christianity. Zoroastrianism has a very clear notion of the concepts of heaven and hell, realities that Ahura Mazda and Angra Mainyu had created for themselves. According to Zoroastrian belief, at the time of death, the dead are led over Chinvat Bridge. This is a bridge shaped like a sword that bridges this world and heaven. If the soul is worthy, then he or she is led across by a beautiful woman. If the soul is unworthy, then he or she is led across by an old hag, and when the soul is halfway across the bridge turns on its edge and the soul topples to hell.[10]  Zoroastrianism also teaches of a second judgement where everyone will be resurrected and judged a second time by Ahura Mazda, and the final battle between good and evil will take place. And the wicked will either burn eternally in hell or be purified in a river of molten metal and allowed to rejoin the new, idyllic Earth that is free of evil . All these are precursors to corresponding beliefs in Christianity. Thus for Zoroastrianism,
‘...death did not end a man’s existence. After death came the awful judgement, at the end of the world, when good gained victory over the forces of evil, all men would be resurrected, and the evil would be banished to the Abode of Lies. This concept of a general judgement was supplemented by a much more vivid notion of the judgement of the individual after death. The dead one would approach the Chinvat Bridge, which crosses to Ahura. Below it hell would yawn. If a man’s good deeds outweighed his bad ones, he would be beckoned onward and cross the bridge with ease. But the wicked would find it impossible and topple over into the regions of punishment.’[11]
Most Christians believe that human beings experience divine judgment and are rewarded either with eternal life or eternal damnation. This includes the general judgement at the Resurrection of the dead as well as the belief (held by Roman Catholics, Orthodox and most Protestants) in a judgment particular to the individual soul upon physical death.
In Roman Catholicism, those who die in a state of grace, i.e., without any mortal sin separating them from God, but are still imperfectly purified from the effects of sin, undergo purification through the intermediate state of purgatory to achieve the holiness necessary for entrance into God's presence. Those who have attained this goal are called saints (Latin sanctus, "holy").[12]
A critical examination of the tenets of Zoroastrianism shows that influenced Christian ethics. In his well developed ethical system, Zarathustra taught as part of his religious teaching, values such as truthfulness, kindness, benevolence, justice, devotion to God and good works which are also upheld by Christianity. Above all, Zarathustra attached special value to adherence to truth which is manifest in the form of good faith in keeping promises and agreements. For Zoroaster, he who breaks his solemn word incurs the honest god’s deadly wrath.[13]
It is obviously likely that many of the Christian doctrines are Christianized teachings of Zoroastrianism. This is more possible because both religions are found in the same geographical area, the Near East. And since religious tenets as part of culture values are easily assimilated by neighbours and Zoroastrianism preceded Christianity, it is likely the former influenced the latter.





[1]“Zoroastrianism” [database online] (assessed 20th October, 2010) available from http://zoroastrianism-wikipedia,the free encyclopaedia.
[2] Ninian Smart, The Religious Experience of Mankind, New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1969, pg.241.
[3] Cf. Sarkodie Agyemang, The Religious Quest for Meaning in Life, pg.17
[4] Cf. Ninian Smart, Op.Cit. pg. 242.
[5] “Zoroastrianism”, Op.Cit

HYPERLINK "http://everything2.com/title/The+Influence+of+Zoroastrianism+on+Christianity+and+Islam%20(ac

[6] Cf.Ninian Smart, Op.Cit.pg 243.
[7] .Ibid, pg. 247.
[8] Cf. Sarkodie Agyemang, Op.Cit, pg.22
[9] Geoffery Chapman, The Catechism of the Catholic Church, London: Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 2000, n.253 and 254.
[10] “Influence of Zoroastrianism on Christianity” [database online] (assessed 20th October, 2010) available from http://everything2.com/title/The+Influence+of+Zoroastrianism+on+Christianity+and+Islam
[11] Ninian Smart, Op.Cit. pg. 308.
[12] “Christianity” [database online] (assessed 23rd October, 2010) available from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christianity
[13] Cf. Sarkodie Agyemang, Op.Cit, pg.24


BIBLIOGRAPHY
Agyemang, Sarkodie, The Religious Quest for Meaning in Life.
Chapman, Geoffery, The Catechism of the Catholic Church, London: Libreria Editrice Vaticana, 2000.
Duchensne- Guillemin, J. “Zoroaster” sv  New Catholic Encyclopedia, Most Rev. William J.          Mcdonald, et al (ed),     V.16.
Microsoft ® Encarta ® 2009. © 1993-2008 Microsoft Corporation.
Molly, Michael, Experiencing the World’s Religions (2nd ed.), New York: McGraw- Hill    Company, 2002.
Ninian, Smart, The Religious Experience of Mankind, New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1969.
Smart, Ninian, The Religious Experience of Mankind, New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, 1969.
The Holy Bible (the Revised Standard Version), New York: CollinsBible, 1971.
The New Jerusalem Bible (Study Edition), London: Darton, Longman and Todd Ltd, 1994.
W.Goetz, Philip, Margaret Sutton, et al (editors), Encyclopaedia Britannica (vol. 30), Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica Inc., 1983.

About Me

My photo
Adetswui near Akatsi, Volta Region, Ghana

Followers